A really fine signature + Horrible signature errors, crimes + fine signatures of others

 I watched some video of someone handwriting "charming", and it seemed King Charles' view of how a visitor's view could be left undisturbed and lijewuse the own lives of all and important communication ideas' communicated 

But I was left wondering, how I could soften the effecrs of my human contacts, is there any such wisdom in signatures for me too? I found some advices, as if Indian, but those seemed to vary who wrote it, but maybe the signature varied. One of the first was like my brother (tens of years ago in our childhood home in Helsinki in the Käpylä ("Pebble place") town district), looki g lije acting, some fine curve without content, then aggressive long steaight line as if somehow attacking me with many others but I do not kniw how, and then referring to our two cousins living near by, another straight line and a reference to our mom in connection with her interest in engineers. And somehow such has deemed to destroy a lot of my life, even though tens of years have already passed. 

(Does underlining a signature quite often mean like under a short note, that one is for one's dearest persons only, neglecting much of what the rest of the world wants or considers right? So it can be neflecting some near relatives too and the rights of other people than the dearest. ) 

These ones (especially the 4.) somehow reminded me of my father, him valuing practical life in gardening on free time, while the environment or times engineering oriented. 

This one brings to my mind Bible's King David, but I haven't read the Bible almost at all, just some impression from some video. There is a large scale holistic view, I guess ruling in practice or having some view of something such, and then jyst lufe kn practice

My mom's signature used to be block like letter ("tikkukirjaimin") R plus straight line with two dots (or was it a line? "Riitta Hari" was the name anyway) above it, plus the letter H and straight line with one dot above it, both lines sloping slightly downward to about the bottom level of the letters. But I feel that she got position as if with a signature R with double arch in the R somewhat like in this video's still shot.

In watching these signatures I thought of my own life: maybe often referring to some wide perspectives, then just living ordinary life, but having difficulties in how to not to get overrun by influencies from others. 

The signatures of just about all the people I knew as younger, were kind of basic letters in their own handwriting's style without any curves etc, but from my later years I have not seen people's signatures. 

Quite many people from Vantaa are/ have been easy to communicate with but do not seem to share taking the whole world respinsibly into account as a value. 

I have liked the practical professions. 

I guess these are like signatures of department store shopkeepers. 

Of women, men, transvestites, etc

 I have written of the rationality of feelings, see https://miraclelikenature.blogspot.com/2024/01/the-paradise-theory-books.html , which I thought to be my lifetime's main work, even though later I have written so much more that I no longer know what such a huge number of texts is about. Anyway, some connect rationality of feelings as a subject with wondering what is the difference of women and men. And that subject often relates with finding a spouce or opinions about transvestites, gays, working women, female looking women, men wanting or not wanting to change to another kind of career, etc. 

My old basic point of view was that boys were often inclined toward army and also often toward engineering kinds of skills, while girls values more wisdom of lufe according to feelings, nonformal social life, language skills, maybe teaching the young, finding a fine place in the world, etc. 

In my twenties I learned that young men were inclined toward more formal social life, as if forming an army, where the neighbouring persons sre not necessarily so trustworthy, and that working life was partly a peace time version of such, and partly some continuation os school's civiliced point of view. 

As I have written healing advices, see CuringGuesses.BlogSpot.com , I have learned that the pvysical charachteristics of women and men are consequencies of always being about to do chores or just dping chores, which is typical for men, or taking care that things are well for life, kind of wisdom of life enough in use and with a holistic view and enough eye for the people's charachteristics, opinions at the moment, etc, and only so continuing to chires, which is typical for women. 

So from women's point of view womem just are interested in different areas of lufe, their skills, quality criterions, values, etc. And so it has seemed ok to allow men too such hobbies, jobs, etc, but not especially just men, and since clothes are meant to be good for the things done and reflect both what is tge hobby, what types of skills, areas of life, skill levels, values, views to life, social approaches egc, then if it is the same hobby with a simikar liking as it's motivation, with same kibd of valyes, skills, skill levels, quality, etc, then quite much the same kind of clothes woukd be right, communicating right, but it does not mean disguising as a person with a different type of job, job position, social valyes, etc. Like a skirt means wantkng to look at tvings from the perspectives of several or many areas of lufe and of their skills, cultivating things well for lufe, kibd of holustically and with atmospheres too like with wisdom of life, and on the other hand obe with one kind of job's skills woukd maybe more naturally use steaight troysers and an ordinary shirt. So it has seemed ok that men with high skills and wusdom of life, with wuse valyes too, coukd use skirt like clith, like for example is estimated of monks and priests. But in practice one has noticed that often people mention make-up and looks, lues and acting in connection with female looks and female clothes. I have never quite understood such, since where are the skills, values, wisdom of lufe, personal charachteristics, etc mentioned kn that? So it seems to refer to some acting kind of inflyences from tv, movies and from estimates of social beneficality. And so it seems that many such persons misuse the classification as female by making choices that are uncomfortable and unwise for women but woukd be ok for selfish men pretending to be women. Which would mean that they are not so positively and wisely cultivating things well for life, and so they at least would need to dress according to what ghey do, with which skills, values, social picture of the world, personal likings and other goals, quality, etc. Which oropably would not be skirt etc lije wisdom of life. And it makes lne guess that such persons are male, which means that tgere are almost no women?? 

* 

But so it seems that if a person is motivated to such, he can change to a woman by choosing to always cultivate very well jyst women's values, wisdom of life, etc, and one can so get children too. My impression is that a gay pair appears like a cultyrally homogenous pair of old times, but it seems to require the culture's civiluced wisdom as their main inclination, and good for chikdren to grow up in woukd demand wishing well for all kinds of children and young peopke around, since ghe children propably grow up in their own ways, each one different. 

Anyway, acting or being female are two different kinds of things, and there are very many different kinds of people in the world. 

I do not know what it affects if the parents are both male but follow civiluced wisdom with civiluced values, but surely those ought not be given any extra rights because someone supposes them female or mother or the like, but instead each deed's quality, goals etc estimated, trwating all fairly is ok. In my eyes it has seemed so that the chikdren develop their personal knterests etc to what they have heard of in their ordinary life but about which their parents do not fully folliw what theh did or did they do a ything or how etc. I was exhausted from my studies, so I tended to say to my dogs they they shoukd not work too much, such wisdom of life is important to remember. So if my dog mentioned something of working a lot, I kind of thought "ouch, give up that subject" and did not pay attention to the dog, instead tried to change to other subjects, for exampke go to the kutchen to see if I coukd make any food for us. And so it turned out tgat my both dogs were very hard working, each on their own areas of life. 

Getting a child as a woman requires among other things the chikd developing normally i.e. well enough during the prenancy, and giving birth, and to these are no sure advices, so one ought to trust wisdom of lufe, understand some instinct level wisdom too, be able to protect one's stomach, etc, and the chkld needs good livibg environment to grow up, the woman is wiser than husband in women types of wisdom, unless the husband is unusually wise, so good life for the family etc is important to offer, and if one wants free time, lne needs to be able to give the child to the care of others for slme hours at least and be able to take care that it goes well, which is a surprisingly much explaining factor of women's styles & charachteristics. 

Why a child or baby can get along with parents if they are dangerously uncooperative to many others

 A child or baby is mainly along ("vanhempiensa siivellä") in the lives of it's parents. It just wonders what all is about, how to live in this kind of world. It is clearly needing the help of it's parents, so it wonders how to get socially along, and tries is it this way or that way, etc. And of things done it sees the possibilitues created by it's environment, which mainly is somewhat along the views of it's parents of how to live and what to pay attention to. So it is the situation of the starting points of the unexperienced. And such produces very varied results, and so school is suppirted because it offers a possibility to create basic life skills and find one's place in the wider society or in the wide world. 

*

1.11.2024   About giving birth   https://miraclelikenature.blogspot.com/2024/01/vihkonen-synnytys-aiti-ja-vauva-terveet.html 

Or at https://miraclelikenature.blogspot.com/2024/01/book-wonderful-miracle-like-beings.html 

My writing work ought to be over

 Yesterday I wrote to some blog of mine the ways of living the weathers in the Finnish Lappland resembling those of living in -4C weathers. Today morning I dreamed of some Santa Claus from Lappland saying that I ought to write that there and there so and so. But I was just exhausted, did not understand and did not have the abiluty to such a work. Lije with university professionals doing some researh I kniw just these and nothing more, so if someone has some insight, they ought to write or otherwise tell of it themselves. It isn't my job, it isn't inside my own abilities or endurancy. I would have written only one comment about a book about Christmas gnome like life year around. But somehow I have been forced to write over 3 000 pieces of advices about skills in my qide picture of the world in all kinds of subjects even loisely connected with Christmas gnone/elf like life or an interest in such. And so I have absolutely nothing more to say, I have reached the furthest edges of any possible view of mine about those story figures slmehow connected with the Finnish cultural inheritage, but not usually considered anything much compared with Finnish everyday life lived according to the Finnish culture and civiliced values. 

My books available at www.amazon.com/author/khtervola or as free versions at MiracleLikeNature.BlogSpot.com .

The same text type would be: objectively thinking persons with wisdom of life writes comments that many people want to hear and likewise stories, kind of an intermediate form of such two types of texts or blog entries. But remember tgat those are different persons, not in any way quaranteed by me anyone. I have not kntentionally caused people being evil, not wishing well in the world, not filling basic criteria of common sense and wisdom, or them lying, acting and taking sides, complaining tgat even such is too beautiful to exist. 

Of inventions far ahead of time

 I saw a video https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GVr8pZmSa-c of an ancient computer, that maybe was used to measure the positions of stars. It seemed made by the help of the wild nature by the sea shoreline somewhere in a warm climate. It seemed to use materials and ideas that were in the air, kind of versilns of the wild nature, instead of the block like precise thinking of education. So like a certain climate and place is good for certain professiobs, maybe the nature there too produces something with such a charm, but that is very far from repeatable work, especially it does not offer full structures to anything asked for that is of such a local kind. 

On the other hand even high skills learned in childhood and a personal hobby like interest do not produce such quality. And much less work like folliwing education in engineering instead of civiluced values and wusdom of life. 

Anniversary celebration "medals"

 In December 1917 was 100 years of Finland having become independent. Was it a year earlier I got in post an advertisement of a free anniversary celebration medal for Finns who such wanted. As I had two dogs, was fond of nature and the place I lived in was arts oriented town, with some practical life too and I was writing of big things in my opinion, I was trying to be religious too and sometimes doing handiworks. So such an anniversary celebration medal seemed to go with nature decoration objects, habdiworks, making home nice, plants on window, having pets, living on a street with an old times army name, and arts of course, reading library's books of ibteresting subjects. So I ordered such an anniversary medal, but when I got it, I did not know what to do it, so it was just on my book shelf. It seemed somehow aimed for doing lots of handiworks or somehow supporting the anniversary celebration of Finland, which I guess this Christmas gnome/elf skills subject too is about but afterwards. With medals it seems to be that those slow down lufe a lot, kind of thinking that the career is over and one ought to concentrate on educating the young, the next generation. I did not know such beforehand, I thought such could be avoided. But for continuing life I maybe need to put away such, or is it to not to value handiworks as representing life. 

( See my books at MiracleLikeNature.BlogSpot.com )

The serene versus the unlucky

 ( "  I watched a video of advices for making an Eurovision song   https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Cv6tgnx6jTQ&list=RDeBnsMKLIQ9o&index=3&pp=8AUB 

It brought to my mind that peace is often not in a situation called peaceful but instead when one oneself is strong and serene and for the good of the world, see my text "An ok angel" https://asorcerer.blogspot.com/2024/04/traditional-finnish-harmony-learned.html .  

"  "  ( The Finnish word for an angel is "enkeli", in which "en" means "No, I am not...", and "keli" means weather to travel in, and those both have to be taken into account: freedom to folliw one's likibgs in miral ways, and takkng the situations into account, the situations of all, and folliwing civiluced valyes and healthy wisdom of life. )

27th of April 2024    Learned from changing weathers demanding individual judgement to stay alive, like the melting of the ice cover of a lake in the spring time. 

16th of April 2024   First, follow civiliced values with good quality. Then have some independency, the right to refuse, so as to have some personal fracturelessness and healthy kibd of wisdom in lufe choices. Pay attention to weather like situatiobs: does the thing seem good, wished for in tge world, and for you right now, and for others, kibd of taking the ibfo of feelibgs into accoubt well, since often drawbacks are difficult to put to words, since those are often in another perspective or side or between perspectives, but kind of felt atmospheric fracturelessness in how one is in a landscape may help one notice such and take them wusely into account. 

* 

In some loose group all following fully the above advices, would maybe bring traditional Finnish type of harmony. " 

Love on the other hand is often when one wishes well for the world, chooses one's courses in life and in the world wisely, but adjusts the amounts, types and exact places of each thing in one's life according to what feels to be good that moment and for one's life at large, see in my text about the singing experience of life https://finnishskills.blogspot.com/2015/11/healthy-ways-of-living.html , was it points 66. - 67. 

" 

66. Sparklingly fascinating human relationships
If one is one's true self in one's human relationships, in one's everyday life encounters, the others too have their characteristics. So if one goies along with them somewhat, the amount like most fascuinates in each type of characteristic, always only for a few minutes or like feels best for onself and is natural. Then one can from one's human cantact each one learn something about life, even if one were different from the other one and even if the others were not so wise and fascinating ordinarily.
So one learns about life, lives a fascinating everuday life, and from each person one can choose which characteristics are like what I am interested in and which get löeft further away. In this way one sometimes gets sparklingly fascinating human relationships, but that means that one should not be rigid, formal or lie to oneself.

67. With things it is the same: if you can yourself choose the distance and how much you associate with them, things are much more fascinating. 

" 

" ) 

 I  was left thinking of my blog text "Peace, peace, love, love" that it is kknd of serene and on strong grounds, ought to be well working in the world, and as such kind of lucky. And much of tgat is from the Finnish cultural inheritage. Why is it then so tgat Finns seem unlucky? Did some unlucky person write about the Finnish cultural inheritage and about tge Finnish nature? Like when I was a child in school age my mom and my luttle brother said they trued makkng slme modern versions of Kalevala's poems, quite of the beginnkng my mom said and my brother said he had work like gone through more since it was interesting. Modern versions of old Finnish type of piems they said but they wete not wise, more like technical and searching for single points to be their type of input, as if such too were wise. So were ghere expressions like "on the long yards of the air / of being without" where a long yard is maybe an expressiln copied from a bird but too technical, too concentrated on amount of something, to bring floyrishing nature, but instead it seemed like a scarce milutary edtimate without many factors estimated in any wsy. And as a bird's view it mentilns a bird only as a part of some part of the landscape, instead of holistically wise like is usually the reason to respect birds. 

These in contrast with "a hymn about the instinctual wisdom of our species" which might have been my father's view copied from the nature sciences, from the Finnish cultural inheritage anf from what he felt to be a good wise objective point of view in humans' pictures of the world.